Document-18. |
Section 12
BATTLE OF BRITAIN A.344696/60/S.7 - 9th November 1960
It will be noticed from the above, that three
Coastal Command Squadrons were included with the squadrons that were able
to claim the Clasp to their 1939-45 Star. It can only be assumed that these
Coastal Command squadrons flew on operational duties with Fighter Command
and therefore their personnel were entitled to the Clasp.
Although the Fleet Air Arm Squadrons 804 and 808 were omitted from the above listing, I have since found out that both these squadrons were added at a later date, and therefore their aircrew were entitled to wear the Clasp. 2,936 airmen flew and took part in the Battle of Britain. It is only natural to assume that the majority were of British nationality, there were in fact 2,340. Other airmen of different nationalities that took part were: Poland 145; New Zealand 127; Canada 112; Czechoslovakia 89; Belgium 28; South Africa 25; Australia 32; France 13; Ireland 10; United States 9; Southern Rhodesia 3; Jamaica 1; These figures are the known, most recent account that was made by F/Lt John Holloway after extensive research, and his listing of Battle of Britain aircrew and their nationalities have now been adopted by the Air Historical Branch and the Airmen's Records Establishment of the Ministry of Defence. This listing now belongs to the historian of the Battle of Britain Fighter Association which was handed to them after the death of F/Lt John Holloway. In Francis K. Mason's book Battle over Britain,
it is stated that 22 Australians took part. This could be taken as understandable at the time. But over sixty years on historians are still digging deep into the archives and updates are often being made to the total figures. Even Holloway's original list can be termed as being out of date, Ken Wynn's "Men of the Battle of Britain" comes close, but there are still a number of errors.
The question will always remain, "how do you determine a pilots nationality?" Is
it the country of his birth? If that is the case then what about those pilots that were born in a foreign while on a short visit. Or how about if the parents were overseas and their child was born in that country. A good example was one pilot who was born in Germany to British parents, so does that make him a German?
Another war would be to determine his nationality by the country that issued his passport. The problem here is if a pilot had been taken to another country such as Canada or Australia by his parents and as a child he travelled on either his fathers or mothers passport, what nationality is given to that child. And to further complicate matters, what if the patents or the child for that matter held passports of two countries. A good example of this is Richard Hillary, born in Sydney Australia. His father was sent to London as the Australian High Commissioner and naturally took his family, Richard included. Up to now Richard is an Australian, but if he was issued with a British passport as well, did that automatically make him British.
No one seems to know the answer because some books identify Richard Hillary as being Australian while others state that he is British. That is only one example and there are many many more, one pilot was listed as an Israeli, other books later changed this to 'Palestinian' now it seem he is British because the latest aircrew listings do not show any Israeli's or Palestinians. So while we can say that nationalities are about 90% correct,
further research and confirmation still needs to be done to provide us with an accurate history. In this case, the RAF when establishing an
airman's nationality were guided by the issuing authority of each airman's
passport, and not the country of birth. Also, a number of airmen, although
born in Australia and other commonwealth countries, lived in England for
a number of years prior to the outbreak of WWII. A good example of this
was F/Lt Richard Hillary, he was born in Sydney Australia but travelled
to England with his father (a government official) when he was only three
years of age. Here it is possible that he travelled to England on his fathers
passport and was therefore regarded as a British citizen. It is unfortunate
that the official records state that he is British, as Australians will
always regard him as an Australian.
|